Data & Methodology

Where the numbers come from.

A benchmark is only useful if you can trust it. Here is exactly how PayerLenz builds every reimbursement figure, so you know what you're looking at before you make an admissions decision with it.

PayerLenz Reimbursement Benchmark result screen
Trust score: 78 out of 100
250
PAYER GROUPS BENCHMARKED
20
STATES AND GROWING
500,000+
ADJUDICATED CLAIMS IN THE POOL

The source: real, adjudicated claims

Every PayerLenz benchmark is built from actual behavioral health claims that have been submitted and paid: more than 500,000 of them, across 250 payer groups and 20 states. We don't use surveys, self-reported averages, or rates borrowed from unrelated medical specialties.

Claims enter the PayerLenz pool from two sources: Revenue Logic's own client base, and behavioral health facilities that contribute de-identified data in exchange for plan discounts or search credits. If a claim hasn't generated an EOB, it doesn't build our benchmarks.

Revenue Logic's own client base
Contributing behavioral health facilities
0
ADJUDICATED CLAIMS
Volume Claims supporting this combination
+
Recency Share from the last 12 months
Trust score: 78 out of 100

The trust score

Every benchmark figure carries a 0–100 trust score, built from two inputs. The first is claim volume: how many adjudicated claims support this specific payer, state, level-of-care, and methodology combination, log-scaled so depth counts without one giant combination dominating. The second is recency: the share of those supporting claims from the last 12 months. A figure built mostly on recent claims scores higher than one built on old ones, and the score shows it.

A low trust score isn't a hidden flaw. It's a clear signal, telling you to treat that specific figure as directional and verify with a live eligibility check or VOB before relying on it.

How we handle BCBS

Blue Cross Blue Shield is not a single payer. It's a federation of independently operating plans, and reimbursement varies enormously by home plan and alpha prefix.

PayerLenz resolves every BCBS claim to its specific home plan and alpha prefix before it enters a benchmark, and a BCBS benchmark search requires the prefix, so the results reflect the plan that will actually adjudicate the claim, not a blended average across plans that share nothing but a logo.

Search Input
BCBS
SIF
Anthem Blue Cross · California Home plan resolved
ICO
Blue Shield · Texas Home plan resolved
Unresolved BCBS claims Excluded from benchmark

Reimbursement methodology, kept separate

Out-of-network payment isn't one formula. PayerLenz classifies claims by the pricing methodology the payer applied, and keeps each methodology's rates separate in every result.

U&C

Usual and customary

MNRP

Medicare-multiple non-network reimbursement

MRC1/MRC2

Maximum reimbursable charge schedules

NAP

Network access pricing

Blending a Medicare-multiple plan with a usual-and-customary plan produces a number that doesn't match any real claim, so we don't.

Now you know how the number works.

See it for a real payer, state, and level of care with the trust score attached.

What a benchmark shows you

You see the distribution, not a single number: the most-likely rate plus the P25, P50, P75, and P90 spread. The most likely rate starts from the all-time median for that cell and moves toward the recency-weighted median. How far it moves depends on how much recent claim volume and how many distinct facilities support the cell. Reimbursement for the same payer varies by plan design and methodology, and a single average hides that variance, so we show it instead.

  • Full percentile spread, not a blended average
  • Year-over-year movement, so trends show before they surprise your AR
  • Low-volume combinations filtered out, not presented as market benchmarks
RTC · Anthem Blue CrossCalifornia
TRUST 72
P25$250 Most Likely$884 P75$1,500 P90$5,995
Sample Reimbursement Benchmark export showing payer, level of care, and percentile pricing

The same methodology this page describes, in a real export.

See it in a real export

Everything on this page — the percentile spread, the trust score, the BCBS resolution — shows up in the actual product. This is a real Reimbursement Benchmark export, not a mockup.

  • Percentile pricing (P25–P90) per payer and level of care
  • Trust score based on claim volume and recency
  • Data year, so you know how current the benchmark is
Download sample PDF
How The Pool Grows

The benchmark pool grows with every contribution

The PayerLenz benchmark pool grows as facilities contribute de-identified, adjudicated claims data, and as Revenue Logic's own claim flow continues. More claims mean tighter, more current trust scores across every payer, state, and level of care. That's why contributing data earns you up to a 25% discount: it makes the tool better for everyone.

See how contribution pricing works